Reported signs of stronger dealmaking interest are accompanied by uneven valuations, with profitability and durable customer relationships drawing attention.
Fintech dealmaking is showing signs of improvement heading into the final quarter of 2026, but buyers remain selective about the businesses and valuations they will support.
According to ANI’s October 23 coverage of a D.A. Davidson report, mergers, acquisitions and capital-raising activity began recovering after a quieter summer. The report described continued interest from strategic buyers and financial sponsors, alongside pressure on revenue multiples in several fintech segments.
The distinction matters: greater willingness to discuss transactions does not necessarily mean sellers can command higher prices.
Profitability and customer access shape the outlook
ANI’s account says revenue multiples for unprofitable fintech companies had compressed, while those for profitable businesses remained comparatively stable.
It also describes increased attention to customer acquisition, distribution and established relationships. As software features become easier to reproduce, buyers are examining whether a company’s access to customers is harder to replicate.
D.A. Davidson’s own announcement confirms that its September FinTech, Data & Analytics report examines M&A, capital raising, public-market valuations and transactions. The full underlying analysis was not available for independent review for this article.
What the reported valuation ranges mean
ANI cites the following projected 2026 enterprise-value-to-revenue ranges from the report’s September data:
| Subsector | Reported EV/revenue range |
|---|---|
| Exchanges and liquidity providers | 5.2×–10.8× |
| Payments companies | 1.0×–3.8× |
These are reported ranges among companies in the respective groups, rather than a single valuation assigned to each sector. TechLayers has not independently checked the underlying company sample or calculation methodology.
An enterprise-value-to-revenue multiple compares a business’s enterprise value with its revenue. A projected-year multiple uses forecast revenue, making the assumptions behind that forecast important.
For illustration, a hypothetical business with an enterprise value of $300 million and projected annual revenue of $100 million would have a multiple of 3×. That calculation alone would say little about its profitability, cash generation or future performance.
Why stronger deal interest can coexist with lower prices
TechLayers analysis: Transaction activity and valuation measure different things.
Activity concerns whether companies and investors are pursuing deals. Valuation concerns the price they are prepared to accept. A market can become more active when buyers and sellers move closer on price, even if those prices remain below earlier expectations.
Likewise, a profitable company and a loss-making competitor can attract different valuations despite reporting similar revenue. Their funding requirements, operating costs and ability to convert sales into cash may differ substantially.
The reported outlook should therefore be read as a selective improvement in dealmaking conditions, rather than evidence of a uniform fintech rebound.
Customer relationships need evidence behind them
A claim of customer loyalty becomes more useful when supported by retention, contract renewals, repeat usage and the economics of acquiring additional customers.
For example, a platform embedded in a customer’s daily financial operations may be costly or disruptive to replace. But that position still needs examination: integration complexity is not the same as customer satisfaction, and historical retention does not guarantee future renewals.
Founders preparing for transaction discussions can make their case clearer by documenting:
- Revenue retention and customer concentration.
- Acquisition costs and the time required to recover them.
- Profitability and cash-flow assumptions.
- Contract terms and renewal patterns.
- The role their product plays in customers’ everyday work.
These are analytical considerations, not additional findings attributed to D.A. Davidson.
What to watch next
A firmer recovery would become easier to assess through completed transactions, disclosed purchase prices and consistently measured deal volumes.
Until then, the reported improvement offers a measured signal: buyers are interested, but business quality and price remain central to whether that interest becomes a transaction.